View the Full List of Bible Study Guides
There are several characteristics that make the Gospel of Mark unique. Too often, these special characteristics are overlooked because Mark is read in light of the other synoptic gospels (Matthew and Luke), or John, or even the letters of Paul.
The author of Mark likely wrote this Gospel for a community of Christians who was experiencing persecution and suffering (see e.g., 4:16-17; 8:34-38; 9:42-48; 10:17-31, 38-39; and 13:9-13). The Christology of the Gospel According to Mark is corrective insofar as it aims to demonstrate the necessity of Jesus' suffering, as well as that of the community itself. "Jesus is presented as a paradigm of the way in which his disciples, including the Markan audience, should endure suffering" (Marcus, 29). Whereas so many people of the period were anticipating a powerful and victorious warrior-Messiah who would overthrow the Roman Empire, Mark presents Jesus as the Son of God whose destiny it was to suffer the fate of the Son of Man, i.e., to die. However, Jesus suffers innocently and is therefore vindicated by God. Likewise, although believers suffer unfairly at the hands of their oppressors, God will vindicate them as well.
Mark was written anonymously either just before or very shortly after the fall of Jerusalem and the destruction of the temple in 70 CE. The earliest surviving statement regarding the authorship of this Gospel comes from Papias in 140 CE, who said it was written by someone named Mark, who was not himself an eyewitness of Jesus, but had been the "interpreter" of the apostle Peter (cf. 1 Peter 5:13; Acts 12:12). The problem with this notion is that it begs the question of why Peter would be depicted so negatively throughout the gospel narrative. Given the date of origin, it is important to remember that Chapter 13 (Mark's "Little Apocalypse") is not simply a collection of vague predictions about some distant future event, but rather a reflection of very real turmoil in the midst of the revolt of the Jews living in Palestine against the Roman imperialist occupation in 66-73 CE, also known as the Jewish War. Mark's Gospel is full of apocalyptic overtones, but these are juxtaposed to a message of suffering discipleship.
When thinking about the structure of Mark, it is absolutely essential to keep in mind that it is a story. In other words, although there is an argument being made in Mark, the author does so by means of a plot rather than through a series of propositions. As a result, there is a significant amount of overlap as themes and motifs are interwoven throughout the narrative. With that in mind, it is nevertheless clear that, aside from the prologue (1:1-13), Mark can be easily divided into two halves (1:14 - 8:30 and 8:31 - 16:8), which pivot on Peter's confession (8:27-30). Prior to the confession, Jesus is a mighty miracle worker performing healings and exorcisms and teaching with profound authority. After the confession, the mood and tone of the Gospel shifts significantly. It is in the second half that we find all three of Jesus' predictions regarding his imminent death (8:31-33; 9:30-31; and 10:33-34). In light of this transition, and with respect to the disciples "inability to fully grasp Jesus" teaching and identity, there are a number of scholars who interpret the episode of Jesus healing the unidentified blind man in Bethsaida (8:22-26) as having a double function: on one hand, it illustrates how Jesus differs from so many other healers of the period; on the other hand, and perhaps more significantly, it suggests that the "blind" disciples (8:18) are on their way to gaining "full sight."
If you cannot find information from our old site on our new site please visit www.bibleresourcecenter.forministry.com